Exploring the dynamics of politics: An archival examination of definitions, traditions, and cultural influences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69496/cjess.v2i1.43Keywords:
Archival research, Political culture, Political history, Politics, State traditionAbstract
The meaning of the word politics has been changing through the years; historical experience, cultural norms, and ideological orientations influence the dynamics of change. In this context, this article aims to contribute to the understanding of how such political definitions have been identified, developed, and applied to practice in the realm of governance and civic engagement. To achieve this, through the review of archival materials, primary and secondary historical sources, and political writings, including state documents, this research attempts to identify the key factors that determine how people and society view politics. In particular, this article pays much attention to how state traditions, political ideologies, and cultural factors define these interpretations, which explores and compares diverse political thoughts and their use in explaining the various aspects of governance, public institutions, and political participation. Accordingly, it has employed methodical archival research to analyze political definitions from a variety of historical periods to show how philosophical, institutional, and ideological factors affect the idea of politics and discuss the relevance of these changing definitions to the present political discourse. The findings indicate that political philosophy is dynamic, not static, and the effects of social interactions, political leaders, and historical settings on political philosophy are real. Specifically, the case study of the archive inquiry provides useful findings on how, over time, political narrative has been employed to justify governments and their power structures, as well as the role of the public. Overall, this research makes a great contribution of this research to political science, historical political analysis, and cultural studies, as it presents a systematic review of the political definitions from an archival perspective. Finally, it also highlighted the role of historical political discourse in the formation of contemporary governance and called for further studies on political concepts and state traditions from an interdisciplinary perspective.
Downloads
References
Abrams, M. H. (1971). A glossary of literary terms. Cengage. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282269915416320
Apel, K. O. (2023). Towards a transformation of philosophy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003448921
Axford, B., Browne, V., Huggins, R., & Isaacs, R. (2005). Politics: An introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978252
Bareis, J., & Katzenbach, C. (2021). Talking AI into being: The narratives and imaginaries of national AI strategies and their performative politics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(5), 855–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007
Barker, E. (2012). The political thought of Plato and Aristotle. Courier Corporation. https://philpapers.org/rec/BARTPT-2
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research. Sage. http://www.sagepub.co.uk/
Baylis, J. (2020). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000798355526784
Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2023). Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foundations of social thought. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130015398815010723
Bodin, J., & Tooley, M. (1955). Six books of the commonwealth. Blackwell Oxford. https://www.yorku.ca/comninel/courses/3020pdf/six_books.pdf
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., Dalege, J., Kievit, R. A., & Haig, B. D. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspect Psychol Sciences, 16(4), 756–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620969647
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2024.2391666
Burgess, J. W. (2019). The foundations of political science. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/burg93494
Cairney, P. (2021). Policy analysis as systems thinking. In P. Cairney (Ed.), The politics of policy analysis (pp. 129–137). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66122-9_11
Carter, B. E. (1954). The conservative mind, by Russell Kirk. Indiana Law Journal, 29(2), 307–314. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/232651198.pdf
Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. (2022). The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22002023
Claessen, H. J., & Skalník, P. (1978). The early state. Mouton Publishers. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9783110813326_A19977465/preview-9783110813326_A19977465.pdf
Clark, V. L. P., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Sage Publications. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000793961434112
Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage Publications. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130008586403648403
Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., & Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.104
Dahinden, J., Fischer, C., & Menet, J. (2020). Knowledge production, reflexivity, and the use of categories in migration studies: Tackling challenges in the field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 44(4), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1752926
Dahl, R. A. (2020). On democracy. Yale University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282269274782080
Davis, N. Y. (1999). What is transversal politics? Soundings, 12, 94–98. https://autonomorganisering.noblogs.org/files/2015/12/davis_transversal-politics.pdf
Debarbieux, B., Bortolotto, C., Munz, H., & Raziano, C. (2021). Sharing heritage? Politics and territoriality in UNESCO’s heritage lists. Territory, Politics, Governance, 11(3), 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1854112
Duranti, A. (2009). History, ideas, and issues in linguistic anthropology. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (2nd ed., pp. 1–59). Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/duranti/reprints/Duranti2001LinguisticAnthropologyHistory.pdf
Easton, D. (1968). A systems analysis of political life. In W. Buckley (Ed.), Systems research for behavioral science (pp. 428–436). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315130569
Easton, D. (2024). The analysis of political structure. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003545798
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1993). The political systems of empires. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315133911
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940). The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Clarendon Press. https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/cultures/fj22/documents/001
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Finer, S. E. (1997). The history of government from the earliest times: Ancient monarchies and empires. Oxford University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360301164101744896
Fox, J. (2018). An introduction to religion and politics: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183787
Frisch, S. A., & Kelly, S. Q. (2012). Political science and the archives. In S. A. Frisch, D. B. Harris, S. Q. Kelly, & D. C. W. Parker (Eds.), Doing archival research in political science (pp. 33–154). Amherst Press.
Gandhi, M., Tagore, R., & Bhattacharya, S. (1997). The Mahatma and the poet: Letters and debates between Gandhi and Tagore, 1915-1941. National Book Trust. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282271316067584
Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The theatre state in nineteenth-century Bali. Princeton University Press. https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/rb68xc071.html
Gerring, J. (1998). Party ideologies in America, 1828-1996. Cambridge University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282272873332992
Govigli, M. V., Efthymiou, A., & Stara, K. (2021). From religion to conservation: Unfolding 300 years of collective action in a Greek sacred forest. Forest Policy and Economics, 131, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102575
Green, A. W. (1993). Hobbes and human nature. Transaction Publishers. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000798127872640
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1361699993842595072
Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341
Haig, R. M. (2020). The concept of income: Economic and legal aspects. In G. W. Dean & M. C. Wells (Eds.), Forerunners of realizable values accounting in financial reporting (pp. 140–167). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003051091
Halperin, S., & Heath, O. (2020). Political research: Methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1131975282641918720
Hanson, J. K., & Sigman, R. (2021). Leviathan’s latent dimensions: Measuring state capacity for comparative political research. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1495–1510. https://doi.org/10.1086/715066
Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy: Understanding and responding to complex challenges. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0
Hedges, P. M. (2021). Understanding religion: Theories and methods for studying religiously diverse societies. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520970861
Hershkoff, H., & Loffredo, S. (2022). Standing for democracy: Is democracy a procedural right in Vacuo? A democratic perspective on procedural violations as a basis for Article III standing. Buffalo Law Review, 70(2), 523-612. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol70/iss2/1
Hobbes, T. (1999). The elements of law, natural and politic: Part I, human nature, Part II, de corpore politico; with three lives. Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/GASTEO-6
Holmes, G. (2024). Augustan England: Professions, state and society, 1680-1730. Taylor & Francis. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282272428130944
Holsti, K. J. (1996). The state, war, and the state of war. Cambridge University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360292620701858176
Honig, B. (2023). Political theory and the displacement of politics. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501768453
Kitromilides, P. M., & Tsoukalas, C. (2021). The Greek revolution: A critical dictionary. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674259324
Knoblauch, H. (2005). Focused ethnography. Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research, 6(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.20
Koukounaras, L. M. (2022). The socio-pedagogical dynamics of religious knowledge in religious education: A participatory action-research in Greek secondary schools on understanding diversity. Religions, 13(5), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050395
Lasswell, H. D. (2013). The analysis of political behaviour. Routledge. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282269218882304
Linklater, A. (2020). The idea of civilization and the making of the global order. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529213898
Lipset, S. M. (2003). Political man: The social bases of politics. In R. A. Dahl, I. Shapiro, & J. A. Cheibub (Eds.), The democracy sourcebook (pp. 56-64). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Matasci, D. (2020). Assessing needs, fostering development: UNESCO, illiteracy and the global politics of education (1945–1960). In E. Unterhalter (Ed.), Measuring the unmeasurable in education (pp. 35–53). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429444494
McLeod, J., & Connor, K. O. (2022). Ethics, archives, and data sharing in qualitative research. In M. Tesar, M. A. Peters, & L. Jackson (Eds.), Is the university an ethical academy? (pp. 105–117). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003324881
Melko, M. (2008). The origins of civilization: Essay with notes. Comparative Civilizations Review, 59(59), 9–28. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol59/iss59/3
Mikac, R., & Wahdyudin, A. Y. (2021). The impact of migration on university education. 2nd International Indonesia Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies (IICIS 2021), 605, 14–24. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iicis-21/125965490
Murphy, J. B., & Garrard, G. (2019). How to think politically: Sages, scholars, and statesmen whose ideas have shaped the world. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/132906
Nightingale, A. J., Eriksen, S., Taylor, M., Forsyth, T., Pelling, M., Newsham, A., Boyd, E., Brown, K., Harvey, B., Jones, L., Bezner Kerr, R., Mehta, L., Naess, L. O., Ockwell, D., Scoones, I., Tanner, T., & Whitfield, S. (2019). Beyond technical fixes: Climate solutions and the great derangement. Climate and Development, 12(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495
O’Sullivan, N. (1976). Implications of the conflicts in Libya and Syria for the responsibility to protect doctrine. In J. Dent & S. P. Perišić (Eds.), Conservatism. (pp. 783–814). Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu. https://www.croris.hr/crosbi/publikacija/prilog-casopis/244965
Orr, J. A., Vinebrooke, R. D., Jackson, M. C., Kroeker, K. J., Kordas, R. L., Mantyka-Pringle, C., Van den Brink, P. J., De Laender, F., Stoks, R., Holmstrup, M., Matthaei, C. D., Monk, W. A., Penk, M. R., Leuzinger, S., Schafer, R. B., & Piggott, J. J. (2020). Towards a unified study of multiple stressors: Divisions and common goals across research disciplines. The Royal Society Publishing, 287, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0421
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications. https://study.sagepub.com/patton4e/help
Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Barnes, T. D. (2020). Women, politics, and power: A global perspective. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000795439524224
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, politics, and the state. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1131693804099867008
Rahe, P. A. (1994). Republics, ancient and modern. UNC Press Books. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000798039043072
Rancière, J. (2023). Politics, identification, and subjectivization. In M. J. Léger (Ed.), Identity Trumps socialism (pp. 35–40). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320890
Razavi, S., Jakeman, A., Saltelli, A., Prieur, C., Iooss, B., Borgonovo, E., Plischke, E., Lo Piano, S., Iwanaga, T., Becker, W., Tarantola, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Jakeman, J., Gupta, H., Melillo, N., Rabitti, G., Chabridon, V., Duan, Q., Sun, X., . . . Maier, H. R. (2021). The future of sensitivity analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support. Environmental Modelling & Software, 137, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104954
Sabine, G. H., & Thorson, T. L. (2018). A history of political theory. Oxford and IBH Publishing. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000795656742016
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5018667
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2020). Meanings of theory: Clarifying theory through typification. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12587
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Jacobs University Bremen.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202050
Selznick, P. (2020). Law, society, and industrial justice. Quid Pro Books. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282270450040192
Shively, W. P., & Schultz, D. (2022). Power and choice: An introduction to political science. Rowman & Littlefield. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000793874162176
Skinner, Q. (1978). The foundations of modern political thought: Volume 2, the age of reformation. Cambridge University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282271165077376
Smith, J. A. (2024). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Sage Publications. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130021052190479134
Sommer, J. M., & Hargrove, A. (2020). Power and politics in the world-system. Journal of World-Systems Research, 26(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2020.998
Taylor, C. (2021). The politics of recognition. In J. Arthur (Ed.), Campus wars (pp. 249–263). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038556
Terchek, R. J., & Moore, D. K. (2000). Recovering the political Aristotle: A critical response to Smith. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 905–911. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586215
Tichenor, M., & Sridhar, D. (2019). Metric partnerships: Global burden of disease estimates within the World Bank, the World Health Organization, and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Wellcome Open Research, 4, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15011.2
Toffler, A. (2022). Powershift: Knowledge, wealth, and power at the edge of the 21st century. Bantam. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000798386776576
Tridimas, G. (2021). Religion without doctrine or clergy: The case of ancient Greece. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137421000461
Wasserman, G., & Fullmer, E. (2023). The basics of American politics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003329343
Weber, M. (2009). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Routledge. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282271506445056
Weible, C. M., Nohrstedt, D., Cairney, P., Carter, D. P., Crow, D. A., Durnova, A. P., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., McConnell, A., & Stone, D. (2020). COVID-19 and the policy sciences: Initial reactions and perspectives. Policy Science, 53(2), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4
Williams, H. (2021). The meaning of “Phenomenology”: Qualitative and philosophical phenomenological research methods. The Qualitative Report, 26(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4587
Wolff, J. (2023). An introduction to political philosophy. Oxford University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282272629325568
Yack, B. (2023). The problems of a political animal: Community, justice, and conflict in Aristotelian political thought. University of California Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282271124747648
