Exploring experimental research: Methodologies, designs, and applications across disciplines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69496/cjess.v2i2.78Keywords:
Causal inference, Experimental research, External validity, Internal validity, Research designsAbstract
Experimental research is a primary scientific method used to elucidate cause-and-effect correlations between variables in diverse fields. Specifically, this paper outlines the essential characteristics of experimental research, encompassing variable manipulation, controlled settings, random assignment, and precise measurement procedures to enable causal inferences. Moreover, the paper clarifies many experimental designs, including randomized controlled trials, true experimental designs, quasi-experimental designs, and single-case designs, each adapted to certain research contexts. Subsequently, the paper delineates the procedural processes for doing experimental research, underscoring the significance of methodological rigor from study design to result interpretation. Furthermore, it outlines the possible challenges to internal and external validity, emphasizing the importance of addressing confounding factors to ensure strong experimental results. In addition, the paper examines the timing of pre-tests and post-tests, the complexities of experimental design, and emerging trends such as internet-based experiments and ex post facto research. Finally, this paper seeks to furnish scholars with a detailed comprehension of experimental inquiry through an extensive analysis of research procedures, designs, and applications across several academic fields.
Downloads
References
Andrade, C. (2018). Internal, external, and ecological validity in research design, conduct, and evaluation. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 40(5), 498-499. https://doi.org/10.4103%2FIJPSYM.IJPSYM_334_18
Bhandari, P. (2022, June 22). Independent vs. dependent variables: Definition & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/independent-and-dependent-variables/
Chan, S., Maneewan, S., & Koul, R. (2021). Cooperative learning in teacher education: Its effects on EFL pre-service teachers’ content knowledge and teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(5), 654-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1931060
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Cornell, D. (2024, January 3). 5 quasi-experimental design examples. Helpful Professor. https://helpfulprofessor.com/quasi-experimental-design-examples/
Edgington, E. S. (1985). Random assignment and experimental research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X85021003007
Frissen, I., & Evans, M. M. (2024). Experimental research in knowledge management. Knowledge and Process Management, 31(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1764
Gavras, A., Karila, A., Fdida, S., May, M., & Potts, M. (2007). Future internet research and experimentation: The FIRE initiative. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(3), 89-92. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1273445.1273460
Kazdin, A. E. (2021). Single‐case experimental designs: Characteristics, changes, and challenges. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(1), 56-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.638
Kuang, K., Li, L., Geng, Z., Xu, L., Zhang, K., Liao, B., ... & Jiang, Z. (2020). Causal inference. Engineering, 6(3), 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.08.016
Leppink, J. (2019). Statistical methods for experimental research in education and psychology. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-21241-4
Marsden, E., & Torgerson, C. J. (2012). Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38(5), 583-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208
Mattila, A. S., Luo, A., Xue, X., & Ye, T. (2021). How to avoid common mistakes in experimental research? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(1), 367-374. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2020-0696/full/html
Rauteda, K. R. (2025). Quantitative research in education: Philosophy, uses and limitations. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.56916/jmrd.v2i1.993
Rogers, J., & Revesz, A. (2019). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 133-143). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780367824471-12/experimental-quasi-experimental-designs-john-rogers-andrea-r%C3%A9v%C3%A9sz
Rohwer, D. (2022). Designing ex post facto and experimental studies. In C. Frierson-Campbell & H.C. Froehlich (Eds.), Inquiry in music education: concepts and methods for the beginning researcher (pp. 230-252). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003057703-15/designing-ex-post-facto-experimental-studies-debbie-rohwer
Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (2013). Experimental research methods. In D. Jonassen & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 1007-1029). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781410609519-51/experimental-research-methods-steven-ross-gary-morrison
Rutter, M. (2007). Proceeding from observed correlation to causal inference: The use of natural experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00050.x
Shadish, W. R., Clark, M. H., & Steiner, P. M. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1334-1344. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000733
Sigall, H., & Mills, J. (1998). Measures of independent variables and mediators are useful in social psychology experiments: But are they necessary? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_5
Simkus, J. (2024, June 26). Randomized controlled trial (RCT). Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/randomized-controlled-trial.html
Steingrimsdottir, H. S., & Arntzen, E. (2015). On the utility of within-participant research design when working with patients with neurocognitive disorders. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 10, 1189–1200. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S81868
Street, D. L. (1995). Controlling extraneous variables in experimental research: A research note. Accounting Education, 4(2), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639289500000020
Sturmberg, J. P., & Marcum, J. A. (2024). From cause and effect to causes and effects. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 30(2), 296-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13814
Thomas, C. G. (2021). Experimental research. In C. G. Thomas (Ed.), Research methodology and scientific writing (pp. 93–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64865-7_5
Van der Stede, W. A. (2014). A manipulationist view of causality in cross-sectional survey research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(7), 567-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.12.001
